← Back to Conflion Conflion · Workflow guide

Midsize Firm Full Walkthrough, step by step

The walkthrough video follows one difficult matter at a fictional mid-size firm, from the first quick conflicts check to the closed file. This page lays out each step, who does it, and the rules the software applies along the way.

Everything shown is invented. The firm is Ashford & Vale LLP, a fictional firm, and every person, client and matter is made up. The video uses the optional tabbed forms, which are switched off by default. Conflion drafts and suggests; a person always decides, and nothing here is legal advice.

The matter

A new client, Ashford Harbor Logistics, wants the firm to bring a claim against Meridian Energy and Northgate Freight. Meridian Energy is already a client of the firm, so the matter needs waivers before anyone can bill it.

Who appears

Priya Raman
Litigation associate who asks for the matter
Rosa Delgado
Priya's secretary, who fills in the full form
Dana Whitfield
Conflicts analyst who reviews hits, waivers and opening
Marcus Bell
Practice group leader who approves
Finance
Checks credit, retainer and rates
General counsel
Gives the last approval

The nine steps

Step 1 · Quick check Priya, the associate
  • Priya starts with a Quick Check, the short first version of a request. She names the new client, the two companies on the other side, and describes the work.
  • It goes straight to the conflicts team. The request gets its own number (QC-…) and the search gets a search number (S-…), so anyone can cite exactly which search was run.

Why: lawyers often need to know whether they can take a call before they have every detail. A quick check answers that without a full form.

Step 2 · Conflicts review Dana, the conflicts analyst
  • The search matches names loosely on purpose: misspellings, nicknames, former names and related companies all count. Each hit shows why it matched and how risky it looks.
  • Dana decides every hit herself. Meridian Energy is a current client, so she marks it "Waiver needed". Hits that turn out to be different companies are cleared.
  • The results message to the lawyer is drafted from her decisions, without AI, and she reads and edits it before it goes.
Step 3 · Waivers Dana, then a reviewing lawyer
  • Dana records the waivers the matter needs: one from the new client and one from each of two current clients.
  • Each consent is drafted from the firm's template. The draft goes to a reviewing lawyer as a task. The lawyer can edit it by typing in the draft and approves it, and the reviewer's name is kept.
  • The draft warns when it names someone the recipient is not cleared to hear about, so confidential details do not leak to another client.
  • Consent requests go out with a private link, automatic reminders, and a record of exactly what was sent.
Step 4 · New business form Rosa, the secretary
  • Rosa sees the results come back and turns the Quick Check into a New Business Form. Its parties, search and hit decisions carry forward, so nothing is retyped and nothing is reviewed twice.
  • She fills in the matter details, including the practice area and the records area. The records area decides which document folders are set up when the matter opens.
  • Name fields for lawyers and staff suggest people as she types. A suggestion is accepted with Tab, and nothing is filled in on its own.
Step 5 · Added parties Rosa, then Dana
  • Rosa adds three parties learned since the quick check: Northgate's parent company, a carrier and an insurer, then sends the form to the conflicts team.
  • Only the new parties need fresh review. The earlier decisions are kept, and the new search gets its own search number linked to the first one.
  • On the form, the Task Action box is ticked from the analyst's decisions, and the summary names the waivers still outstanding.
Step 6 · Approvals Practice group leader, finance, general counsel
  • The sign-off route comes from the firm's own approval rules. Here that is the practice group leader, then finance, then general counsel.
  • Each approver sees the matter and every searched party in front of them, and signs off in turn.
  • If an approver has a disclosed interest in a party, for example shares in the company on the other side, the software keeps them off the route. It says why, sends the step to an alternate approver, and tells both people.
Step 7 · Matter opened Dana
  • Once approved, the matter can be opened straight away. It gets a client.matter number (011072.0001 in the video), and its document folders can be used.
  • It shows as "Open · billing on hold" until the signed engagement letter and waivers are on file.
  • The billing record for the firm's accounting system (Aderant in the video) is prepared with the hold noted. Aderant stays the billing system.

Why: work often has to start before every signature is back. Opening and billing are kept separate, so the file is usable while the paperwork catches up, but no time can be billed until it does.

Step 8 · Signed papers Dana, the client and the responsible lawyer
  • The engagement letter is drafted for review, and its conflicts clause asks the client for informed written consent.
  • Conflion never signs or e-signs for anyone. A letter counts only when signed copies are uploaded, with each signer named: the client and the responsible lawyer for the firm.
  • Each waiver recipient sees only the summary prepared for them, and returns a signed copy through their link or by upload.
  • With the letter and every waiver in, the billing hold clears by itself and the matter is open for billing.
Step 9 · Closing Priya, then Dana
  • When the case settles, Priya sends a Change Form asking to close the matter. She confirms the final bill has gone out and the trust balance is zero.
  • The conflicts team signs off and makes the change.
  • The matter is closed, and the file is kept for seven years under the litigation retention policy.

How the workflow works

One record, start to finish

A quick check, the new business form it becomes and the matter it opens are the same record. Parties, searches, hit decisions, waivers and comments follow it, so every later step can see what earlier steps decided.

Every search is numbered

Each search run gets a number that is never reused, with who ran it, when, and what it covered. Re-runs and added-party searches get new numbers linked to the original. A party's earlier searches are shown wherever its name is entered.

People decide, software suggests

Hits are ranked and explained, and drafts are prepared from templates, but only a person records a decision, approves a draft or uploads a signed copy. Where a local AI model is used, its suggestions are marked and must be checked.

Tasks tell each person what is next

Every step creates a task for the right person: the analyst reviews hits, the lawyer reviews a waiver draft, the secretary converts a quick check, the approver signs off. A next-step helper on each request says what it is waiting on.

Approval routes follow firm rules

Rules choose the approvers from the matter's practice area, office, fee size and risk. General counsel is added for restricted, high-fee or high-risk matters. Approvers with a disclosed interest are routed around, with alternates named in setup.

Opening and billing are separate

Approvals and a cleared conflicts check let a matter open. The engagement letter, waivers, conflicts follow-ups and any conditions only hold billing. The hold lifts when the last item is done.

Confidentiality is enforced on the server

Ethical walls and confidential matters are removed from what each person's browser receives, not just hidden on screen. Waiver recipients and approvers see only what they are cleared to see, and blocked attempts are logged.

Changes and closing go through the same checks

A Change Form adds parties, moves lawyers, or closes and reopens a matter. Added parties are searched, the conflicts team signs off, and a matter cannot close until the final bill is out and the trust balance is zero.

Everything is on the record

Each action is written to an audit trail that cannot be edited, with a built-in check that shows whether the trail is intact.